Bug#827425: RFS: lacme/0.1-1 [ITP] -- ACME client written with process isolation and minimal privileges in mind

[Harlan Lieberman-Berg <hlieberman@debian.org>]

Guilhem Moulin <guilhem@guilhem.org> writes:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lacme"

Hello Guilhem!

This looks like a well-Debianized package to me.

I'm curious about how you would differentiate a package like this from
the other ACME clients out there -- I know specifically letskencrypt
seems to fall in the same kind of category (highly isolated components;
it uses pledge(2) and chroot(2) as well).

I also want to make you aware of the Let's Encrypt Debain Packaging
Team, in case you were interested in having the package be co-maintained
with us (with the team in Uploaders), or maintained under that heading
entirely (with the team in Maintainer).

Sincerely,
-- 
Harlan Lieberman-Berg
~hlieberman