On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 01:07:05PM +1000, Jonathon Love wrote:
> thanks for the review, and sorry for the embarrassing "does not build"
> situation. i was packaging on ubuntu, and my experience has been that if it
> works there, it will work on debian - but apparently not, i'll be more
> careful in future.
umh, you force pushed everything, master, upstream and pristine-tar
branches. WHY? what did you do?
And still it doesn't build, if that was meant to fix it.
Without thinking of it I already overwrote the older files, so I can't
diff anymore :S
> i'm actually writing to ask your advice about the name of the package.
>
> upstream is called protobuf3, but it's an implementation of protocol buffers
> 2 for python 3
Then name made me wonder too.
I would like for somebody else on the mentors list to comment on it, but
also keep in mind that there is a python policy that says the name
should be python(3)-${module name}, that is, whatever you import.
> python3-pr0ger-protobuf3
>
> after the developer's nick:
This golang-style name would actually turn me mad :|
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature