Bug#824186: RFS: pepperflashplugin-nonfree/1.8.3+nmu1 [RC] [NMU]
Hi,
>Isn't I'm supposed to raise the version number? or is "+nmu1" enough?
I'm not sure, but in fact dch --nmu is not raising it, so I guess
1.8.2+nmu1 is fine, so the maintainer can still bump and release an NMU acknowledge
called 1.8.3
>It part of the fix, but not needed to fix #818540 (as I understand).
not a problem
>No file attached here? You talking about this file correct?
>https://patches.ubuntu.com/p/pepperflashplugin-nonfree/pepperflashplugin-nonfree_1.8.2ubuntu1.patch
yes
>I did as https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=818540#39 suggested, do you disagree with that solution? Is the original solution preferred?
it is fine, I just want to know your opinion.
>Just pushed to mentors.
seems still not working completely...
this is what I get on a clean pbuilder environment
ERROR: failed to retrieve status information from google : W: http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/dists/stable/Release.gpg: Signature by key 4CCA1EAF950CEE4AB83976DCA040830F7FAC5991 uses weak digest algorithm (SHA1)
W: http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/dists/stable/Release.gpg: Signature by key 3B068FB4789ABE4AEFA3BB491397BC53640DB551 uses weak digest algorithm (SHA1)
the ubuntu version prints the warning but starts the download anyway.
what do you think about?
G.
----------------------------------------
> Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 19:41:25 +0000
> From: locutusofborg@debian.org
> To: klausenbusk@hotmail.com; bartm@debian.org; 824186@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Bug#824186: RFS: pepperflashplugin-nonfree/1.8.3+nmu1 [RC] [NMU]
>
> control: owner -1 !
> control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
>
> Hi, some questions about versioning and changelog:
>
> 1) why 1.8.3+nmu1 and not 1.8.2+nmu1?
> 2) why UNRELEASED? please set unstable
>
> "* Validate deb file with sha256sum." <-- isn't this part of the fix for bug #818540?
>
> the other stuff LGTM, I hope to sponsor it soon :)
>
> BTW did you see the ubuntu diff?
> you might want to take some bits
>
> (attaching the debdiff between debian and ubuntu, I'm not talking about fields like changelog entries
> and maintainer field, more about the update script)
>
> thanks!
>
> G.
>
>
> Il Venerdì 13 Maggio 2016 15:39, Kristian Klausen <klausenbusk@hotmail.com> ha scritto:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: important
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pepperflashplugin-nonfree":
>
> * Package name : pepperflashplugin-nonfree
> Version : 1.8.3+nmu1
> Upstream Author : Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org>
> * URL : http://wiki.debian.org/PepperFlashPlayer
> * License : GPL3
> Section : Browser plugin
>
> It builds those binary packages:
>
> pepperflashplugin-nonfree
>
> To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:
>
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/pepperflashplugin-nonfree
>
>
> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
>
> dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/p/pepperflashplugin-nonfree/pepperflashplugin-nonfree_1.8.3+nmu1.dsc
>
>
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> pepperflashplugin-nonfree (1.8.3+nmu1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
>
> * Non-maintainer upload.
> * Update Google public key. Closes: #823005.
> * Remove 32 bit support. Closes: #816848.
> * Don't treat `apt-get update` warnings as errors. Closes: #818540.
> * Validate deb file with sha256sum.
>
> -- Kristian Klausen <klausenbusk@hotmail.com> Fri, 13 May 2016 14:44:52 +0200
>
>
> Regards,
> Kristian Klausen
Reply to: