Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2016 10:18:34 +0000 (UTC) with message-id <2104225818.458103.1462961914458.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#811073: RFS: lbfgsb/3.0-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #811073, regarding RFS: lbfgsb/3.0-2 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 811073: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=811073 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: RFS: lbfgsb/3.0-1 [ITP]
- From: Gard Spreemann <gspreemann@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 13:41:16 +0100
- Message-id: <145286167622.5887.17474153321573886461.reportbug@giraffe.nonempty.org>
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lbfgsb" * Package name : lbfgsb Version : 3.0-1 Upstream Author : Ciyou Zhu, Richard Byrd, Jorge Nocedal and Jose Luis Morales * URL : http://users.iems.northwestern.edu/~nocedal/lbfgsb.html * License : BSD-3-clause Section : math It builds these binary packages: liblbfgsb-dev - Limited-memory quasi-Newton bound-constrained optimization (static library) liblbfgsb0 - Limited-memory quasi-Newton bound-constrained optimization liblbfgsb0-dbg - Limited-memory quasi-Newton bound-constrained optimization (debug symbols) Note that upstream's tarball [1] contains precompiled binaries, and is also a minor tarbomb. I have therefore repackaged it. You will find that my orig tarball is a strict subset of upstream's. My package includes two patches: - replace-linpack-with-lapack.patch: The library code originally uses LINPACK (from an embedded copy). Since LINPACK has largely been superseded by LAPACK, this patch replaces calls to the former with equivalent calls to the latter. Specifically, dpofa is replaced by dpotrf, and dtrsl is replaced by dtrtrs. - silence.patch: The library's documentation indicates that it will only write out messages when the iprint flag is greater than zero. There are two places where writing still happens unconditionally, which this patch fixes. A similar patch was also applied by the SciPy project (see their issue 3238). I've used the patched package on and off for the past few years and have not encountered problems. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/lbfgsb Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lbfgsb/lbfgsb_3.0-1.dsc More information about lbfgsb can be obtained from [2]. [1] http://users.iems.northwestern.edu/~nocedal/Software/Lbfgsb.3.0.tar.gz [2] http://users.iems.northwestern.edu/~nocedal/lbfgsb.html Regards, Gard Spreemann
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Gard Spreemann <gspreemann@gmail.com>, <811073-done@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Bug#811073: RFS: lbfgsb/3.0-1 [ITP]
- From: Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 10:18:34 +0000 (UTC)
- Message-id: <2104225818.458103.1462961914458.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
- Reply-to: Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 3487981.dxNXgTgczO@giraffe>
- References: <[🔎] 3487981.dxNXgTgczO@giraffe>
Hi, I sponsored, but please make the package multiarch in your next upload. bonus point if you provide me a -2 entry multiarch ready https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Implementation I also refactored a little bit the package, I'm attaching the debian directory to this email also for the next upload, please enable harderning https://wiki.debian.org/HardeningWalkthrough BTW I'm not really sure about the pdf files, maybe you can consider adding them in a -doc package. and they might be source of reject because they aren't enough "source files" thanks for your contribution to Debian! cheers Gianfranco Il Giovedì 5 Maggio 2016 14:09, Gard Spreemann <gspreemann@gmail.com> ha scritto: On Wednesday 30 March 2016 18:31:48 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi > > >http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lbfgsb/lbfgsb_3.0-2.dsc > >addresses the standards-version and the dbg package. I'll have to work > >on the watch file and (if needed) the build system. > > ok, let me know when the other points are addressed, and I'll grab it :) > (please call it always -1, until it goes in unstable/new queue) Hi again, I believe I've addressed the issues you raised now (3.0+dfsg.1-1, [1]). The watch file with repacking currently does *not* use Files-Excluded, but rather Ben Finney's repack scripts [2]. I'm guessing the Files-Excluded method is preferable, but I wasn't thinking straight when I made the change. Please let me know if it's preferable to have it that way. [1] https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lbfgsb/lbfgsb_3.0+dfsg.1-1.dsc [2] https://wiki.debian.org/BenFinney/software/repack Best, GardAttachment: lbfgsb_3.0+dfsg.1-1.debian.tar.xz
Description: application/xz
--- End Message ---