Bug#818687: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.4.1-1.1 [NMU]
On 23 April 2016 at 00:06, Nicholas D Steeves <nsteeves@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 21 April 2016 at 08:33, Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de> wrote:
>> Hi Gianfranco,
>>
>> On 04/21/2016 09:48 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>>>> activate update-initramfs
>>> do you think it is worth adding to the current NMU or it is better to leave it for
>>> a future upload?
>>
>> I'm not sure if you meant to ask me, but just in case: I would suggest
>> you do so, but it's not my decision, as it's not my package. ;-)
>>
>>> the change looks good, I think it has no side effects,
>
> I really like this change to using a trigger! It also works fine on
> Jessie, meaning it won't complicate maintaining a backport. As I'm
> not listed in Uploaders, Maintainers, or Changed-by, would making this
> change be considered a package hijack?
I haven't looked closely, but i have a lot dubious emails about btrfs package.
(a) i do not maintain backports, anybody is free to do those
(b) all of my packages are lowNMU, meaning I trust any/all DDs to do
sensible things
(c) I do not trust any other developers, meaning that nobody should be
granting DM and/or changing Uploaders/Maintainers fields etc
(d) any other fixes is fine to be uploaded, and if things break I am
on the hook to fix things up afterwards =)
http://blog.surgut.co.uk/2013/01/thoughts-on-debian-package-policies.html
--
Regards,
Dimitri.
Reply to: