Your message dated Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:30:36 +0000 (UTC) with message-id <1642172381.6606122.1461177036634.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#814550: RFS: codecrypt/1.7.3-1 (ITP #814462) has caused the Debian Bug report #814550, regarding RFS: codecrypt/1.7.4-1 (ITP #814462) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 814550: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814550 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: RFS: codecrypt/1.7.3-1 (ITP #814462)
- From: Miroslav Kratochvil <exa.exa@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 22:39:08 +0100
- Message-id: <CAO0uZ+-oBgfOwDhea96Cwdw+igSU7Fk30rHCmzK+9rSFU44UFg@mail.gmail.com>
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "codecrypt" * Package name : codecrypt Version : 1.7.3-1 Upstream Author : Mirek Kratochvil <exa.exa@gmail.com> * URL : https://github.com/exaexa/codecrypt * License : LGPL3 Section : utils It builds those binary packages: codecrypt - post-quantum encryption&signing tool To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/codecrypt Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/codecrypt/codecrypt_1.7.3-1.dsc More information about codecrypt can be obtained from the quick README on the GitHub page (see URL). The software is a simplified post-quantum-only workalike of GnuPG, useful mainly for working with some non-mainstream and non-RSA crypto in a human-friendly way. Debianization process is watched in github issue #10. With regards, Mirek Kratochvil
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Miroslav Kratochvil <exa.exa@gmail.com>, <814550-done@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Bug#814550: RFS: codecrypt/1.7.3-1 (ITP #814462)
- From: Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:30:36 +0000 (UTC)
- Message-id: <1642172381.6606122.1461177036634.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
- Reply-to: Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAO0uZ+9h3O1Pa4CcTysg9tte_M8kB+URiEsSY5D9mpjaxxFBFQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[🔎] CAO0uZ+9h3O1Pa4CcTysg9tte_M8kB+URiEsSY5D9mpjaxxFBFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, I did sponsor the package, after changing the rules file (removed uncommented stuff, added harderning stuff, new tarball attached) some nitpicks. the tool is called codecrypt, and the binary ccr. How do you expect users to find it? another issue: the binary is ~500k how do you feel about having a libcodecryptfoo and link it to the binary? does it sound good to you? anyway, thanks for your contribution to Debian! cheers, Gianfranco Il Domenica 17 Aprile 2016 16:57, Miroslav Kratochvil <exa.exa@gmail.com> ha scritto: Thanks a lot for the review, I've fixed the license issues, libs and build deps. New uploaded version should appear on mentors in no time. The code with `make dist' and `mk-orig-source' is a fossil from first packaging attempt (trying to get both GBP and development in one repo). Now the package repo is a separate, "completely normal" gbp with import-orig's here: https://github.com/exaexa/codecrypt-debian (relevant discussion can be found on pkg-privacy ML on alioth). Best regards and thanks again. -mk On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 at 21:05 Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org> wrote: control: owner -1 ! >control: tags -1 moreinfo > >Hi, lets review: > >control: >autotools-dev, dh-autoreconf, > >I think autoreconf alone should be enough. > >libgmp10, libcrypto++9v5, libfftw3-double3 > >on noes! shlibs:Depends should do that automatically. If not, it means your binaries are not >linking correctly the library from the development package in build-dependencies. > >Please remove and test a built deb file under section debian/control to see how they were substituted. > >copyright: license is wrong. >(licensecheck is a good help) > > >rules: >$(DEB_SOURCE)-$(DEB_VERSION_UPSTREAM).tar.gz: > $(MAKE) dist > >.PHONY: mk-orig-source >mk-orig-source: $(DEB_SOURCE)-$(DEB_VERSION_UPSTREAM).tar.gz > ln -f "$<" ../$(DEB_SOURCE)_$(DEB_VERSION_UPSTREAM).orig.tar.gz > > >why? you already use uscan and uupdate to download the tarball, why is the above code useful? > >other stuff LGTM > >cheers >G. > >Attachment: codecrypt_1.7.4-1.debian.tar.xz
Description: application/xz
--- End Message ---