[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#818687: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.4.1-1.1 [NMU]



also some issues might be fixed in a later release

http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/btrfs-progs/4.4.1-1.1/lintian

I: btrfs-progs source: duplicate-short-description btrfs-tools btrfs-tools-dbg
I: btrfs-progs source: duplicate-long-description btrfs-tools btrfs-tools-dbg
W: btrfs-progs source: dbg-package-missing-depends btrfs-tools-dbg

and take care of piuparts
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/btrfs-progs/4.4.1-1.1/piuparts

  /var/lib/dpkg/info/btrfs-progs.postinst: 7: hash: update-initramfs: not found

(this isn't a regression, and I don't know a good way to make it depend on the package providing that file)

thanks, in case you have fixes let me know and I'll cancel the upload in deferred and quickly reupload.

G.

On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 13:09:06 +0000 (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi, uploading in deferred/10 in a few minutes.
> 
> let me know if I can speed it up, or I have to cancel it
> 
> 
> thanks for your contribution to Debian!
> 
> Just a comment:
> what does the following do?
> -if [ -x /usr/sbin/update-initramfs ] && [ -e /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf ]
> +hash /usr/sbin/update-initramfs
> +if [ -x `hash` ] && [ -e /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf ]
> 
> why should it be better?
> 
> 
> cheers,
> 
> G.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Il Sabato 9 Aprile 2016 21:15, Nicholas D Steeves <nsteeves@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> On 8 April 2016 at 17:43, Gianfranco Costamagna
> 
> <costamagnagianfranco@yahoo.it> wrote:
> >>Given that both of these will be broken if this package isn't
> >>uploaded, is now the time to upload it?
> >
> > I didn't understand this sentence.
> 
> It turns out debian-cd can list both btrfs-tools and btrfs-progs to
> handle the transition, however long it takes.
> 
> #820479 (debian-cd) is now marked pending, and #820483 (partman-btrfs)
> depends on this rename being uploaded to unstable.  Because Christian
> Perrier tells me staging in experimental isn't feasible, "the
> installer and its components doesn't make good use of experimental,"
> (#820483, 9 April 2016) I've reuploaded a btrfs-progs package to
> debian-mentors that targets unstable instead.
> 
> Thanks again!
> Nicholas
> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: