[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#808782: Fwd: Bug#808782: RFS: jpedal4-lgpl [ITP] Java PDF Extraction Decoding Access Library (LGPL4)



Hello Markus:

Sorry for my late reply and thanks for your sponsorship.

On 07/01/16 11:26, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> 
> Am 22.12.2015 um 22:56 schrieb Jerome BENOIT:
> [...]
>>
>> Dear Mentors:
>>
>> 	I am looking for a sponsor for the packages jpedal4-lgpl, a wide used
>> 	Java library that allows one to manipulate PDF material.
>> 	The concerned version of jpedal is actually frozen, but it is still
>> 	wildly used because of its license.
>>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Some remarks:
> 
> I cloned the sources from
> 
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/jpedal4-lgpl.git/
> 
> The package fails to build from source, probably the same issue as with
> openviewerfx, an incompatibility with bouncycastle 1.51.
> 
> src/org/jpedal/io/CertificateReader.java:70: error: method getContent in
> class RecipientInformation cannot be applied to given types;
>                         envelopedData = recipientInfo.getContent(key,
> provider);
>                                                      ^
>   required: Recipient
>   found: Key,String
>   reason: actual and formal argument lists differ in length
> Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API.
> Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details.
> Note: Some input files use unchecked or unsafe operations.
> Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details.
> 1 error
> 9 warnings
> 
> 
> What is your motivation to package jpdal4-lgpl for Debian? Is this
> library a requirement for something else? Why would we need jpedal4 if
> the development is frozen?
> 
> The package claims jpedal4 is actively developed but is this really
> true? The homepage address of the fork is
> 
> https://github.com/on-site/JPedal
> 
> and I can see only two commits there and no releases. Looks pretty dead
> in my opinion.

You are right.
Meanwhile OpenViewerFX moved to GitHub and thing get clearer for me:
I am not sure that this pacakge is indeed still needed.
For now I will focus on the OpenViewerFX package.
The probability is high that I abandon this package:
I will let you know and I will clean the place if it happens.


Best regards,
Jerome



> 
> Regards,
> 
> Markus
> 
> 


Reply to: