[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#804644: RFS: flashybrid/0.19 [ITA]



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Control: noowner -1

Hi, almost two months have been passed, and I still don't see progresses
.

Unassigning myself for now.

g.

On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 20:29:30 +0100 Tim Weippert <weiti@weiti.org> wrote:
> Hi Mattia,
> 
> i had talked to Thibaut and I'am willing to took maintainership for
> this packages, currently i'am working on an new Upload to
> incorporate the review from Gianfranco and the suggestions he
> mention.
> 
> If i'am ready i will announce it for review on the debian-mentors
> mailinglist.
> 
> regards, tim
> 
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 05:28:30PM +0000, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 06:42:36PM +0100, Thibaut Varène wrote:
>>> I suppose what I need is having people take over my packages
>>> and call it a day, tbh. With my upload rights revoked there’s
>>> not much meaning in being a DD.
>> 
>> Not really. There are several active DDs who got their key
>> removed due to the 1024 purge and still have packages sponsored. 
>> Sponsoring a DD is also easier, you know that most probably the 
>> sponsoree is already aware of good conventions, etc.
>> 
>> Don't give up just for this inconvenience, ask for sponsorship
>> and as soon as you manage to get your key back into the keyring
>> you can come back full steam :)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> PS: @Tim: what about this RFS?
>> 
>> -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo
>> 
>> GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540
>> .''`. more about me:  http://mapreri.org
>> : :'  : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri
>> `. `'` Debian QA page:
>> https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-
> 
> 
> 
> -- Tim Weippert http://weiti.org - weiti@weiti.org GPG Fingerprint
> - E704 7303 6FF0 8393 ADB1  398E 67F2 94AE 5995 7DD8
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=o+21
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: