[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#810921: RFS: rep-gtk/1:0.90.8.2-1 [ITA] -- GTK+ binding for librep



On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:27:00PM +0000, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 09:44:23PM +0000, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> > Sorry for taking a long time to reply, adding my delay I had email
> > problems.
> 
> funny ;)
> 
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:13:29AM +0000, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > >   + I have a extended-description-is-probably-too-short, please fix.
> > 
> > I don't know what to add to the description so requested the help of
> > Upstream.
> 
> Ok.
> 
> > > * you're building static libraries.  Do you really need them?  In Debian
> > >   we don't like static libraries.  Given that this is a standard autofoo
> > >   package, --disable-static to configure should do the trick.
> > >   + this will also get rid of unstripped-static-library and
> > >     non-empty-dependency_libs-in-la-file lintian tags.
> > 
> > See https://bugs.debian.org/684443
> 
> Ok.
> 
> > > * something to say about https://bugs.debian.org/680449 ?
> > 
> > No longer makes sense with the new version.  When this rep-gtk and
> > sawfish hit experimental I will ask user to try again.
> 
> Ok.
> 
> 
> All in all, this looks good to me.
> Shall I upload? :)
> 

Yes, please.  By any chance are you at FOSDEM?

Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz


-- 
--
	A consciência e aquela voz interior que nos adverte de que
	alguem pode estar olhando.
		-- H. L. Mencken

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: