Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system

[Dmitry Smirnov <onlyjob@debian.org>]

On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:52:17 PM Piotr Robert Konopelko wrote:
> Of course I think MooseFS is better,

I'd much appreciate if you could elaborate on details how MooseFS is better.
I could not find anything to support that claim.


> Apart this I don't think, that LizardFS maintainer would "replace"
> LizardFS with MooseFS.

That is correct. However I would replace MooseFS with LizardFS without 
hesitation.

-- 
Best wishes,
 Dmitry Smirnov.

---

You have to start with the truth. The truth is the only way that we can
get anywhere. Because any decision-making that is based upon lies or
ignorance can't lead to a good conclusion.
        -- Julian Assange, 2010

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.