Bug#791463: closing RFS: udfclient/0.8-1 [ITP] -- userland implementation of the UDF filesystem
On Monday 14 December 2015 12:37:24 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> On 14/12/15 12:33, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Friday 11 December 2015 18:04:06 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> >> > you just dropping the patch into the right place.
> > I know where and how. But I do not like idea to patching original source
> > code if it is possible to compile and use it without patching.
> >
> > Using patches has problem for inconsistency and upgrading if original
> > source code which patch modify changes.
> >
> > And also I see using patches as last option. Are not Debian want to
> > reduce patches if they are not really needed?
>
> I think it's appropriate to apply a patch (and submit it upstream) in
> this case, as this is certainly a bug in the upstream makefile, and it
> should be fixed.
Ok. I can send patch to upstream project which fix compilation (on
debian). But, what is wrong with my original (and current) version which
use pmake and does not need patching original software?
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@gmail.com
Reply to: