[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#807789: marked as done (RFS: 4ti2/1.6.7+ds-1 [New Upstream Release])

Your message dated Sun, 13 Dec 2015 02:31:04 +0000
with message-id <20151213023104.GG3815@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#807789: RFS: 4ti2/1.6.7+ds-1 [New Upstream Release]
has caused the Debian Bug report #807789,
regarding RFS: 4ti2/1.6.7+ds-1 [New Upstream Release]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
807789: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=807789
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear Mentors:

	I am looking for a sponsor for the package 4ti2 [1] that
 	I am maintaining on behalf of the Debian Science-Team.
	This version is a `New upstream release' that fixes a broken
	test and some cosmetic issues.

Thanks,
Jerome

[1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/4ti2.git


-- System Information:
Debian Release: Jessie*
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt11-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 02:19:41AM +0000, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> I'm currently building it, and if it will I'll upload it as-is, but I
> have a couple of question for you nontheless:

Well, it built, so I uploaded it, though I'm still curious about the
questions below :)

> 
> * why don't you try to use the git repository in a sane way?  just
>   importing .dsc you build somehow else is not really a good use of it,
>   you lost a lot of benefith of git and makes unnecessarily hard for
>   sponsors to review the changes (=> I couldn't use it at all...)
> * I guess
>         - debian/{patches,adhoc}/*:
>           - test walk 344, revive;
>           - refresh.
>   means something to you, but pretty sure it does mean nothing to me,
>   especially the "test walk 344, revive" line.  At least for the patches
>   next time can you try to be more verbose on what you did?  what you
>   added, what you dropped and why.
> 
> -- 
> regards,
>                         Mattia Rizzolo
> 
> GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
> more about me:  http://mapreri.org                              : :'  :
> Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
> Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-



-- 
regards,
                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
more about me:  http://mapreri.org                              : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: