Bug#803620: marked as done (RFS: afl-cov/0.3-1 [ITP] -- code coverage for afl)
Your message dated Tue, 3 Nov 2015 14:45:00 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <155695139.2383692.1446561900966.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#803620: RFS: afl-cov/0.3-1 [ITP] -- code coverage for afl
has caused the Debian Bug report #803620,
regarding RFS: afl-cov/0.3-1 [ITP] -- code coverage for afl
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
803620: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=803620
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Control: block 796821 by -1
Hello,
I'm looking for a sponsor for my new package of afl-cov [1], a little tool
which is build around gcov to add code coverage monitoring to the fuzzing
(brute force vulnerability detection) of afl (American Fuzzy Lop).
I have a buildlog here:
http://www.danielstender.com/buildlogs/afl-cov_0.3-1_amd64-20151101-0153.build
And a mentors upload prepared:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/afl-cov
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/afl-cov/afl-cov_0.3-1.dsc
Thank you very much for consideration,
Daniel Stender
[1] https://github.com/mrash/afl-cov
--
4096R/DF5182C8
46CB 1CA8 9EA3 B743 7676 1DB9 15E0 9AF4 DF51 82C8
LPI certified Linux admin (LPI000329859 64mz6f7kt4)
http://www.danielstender.com/blog/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi, Built&Signed&Uploaded, thanks for your contribution to Debian!
And please, when using github to forward patches (inside comments)
consider using markdowns
like
```
code
```
that way the patch will be copy-pastable :)
also ```diff ``` is nice, because it automatically hightlights the code.
cheers,
G.
Il Domenica 1 Novembre 2015 18:00, Daniel Stender <debian@danielstender.com> ha scritto:
... "import subprocess32" of course doesn't work but "import subprocess32 as subprocess". Fixed
it and refreshed the mentors upload.
Daniel
--
4096R/DF5182C8
46CB 1CA8 9EA3 B743 7676 1DB9 15E0 9AF4 DF51 82C8
LPI certified Linux admin (LPI000329859 64mz6f7kt4)
http://www.danielstender.com/blog/
--- End Message ---
Reply to: