[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#787861: review: polyml



Hi,
I believe I have addressed the changes you mentioned in http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/polyml/polyml_5.5.2-0.2.dsc, and would be grateful if you could please review it.

Thanks,
James

> On 6 Oct 2015, at 10:54, James Clarke <jrtc27@jrtc27.com> wrote:
> 
> Firstly sorry for not replying, I hadn’t subscribed to the bug so I was never emailed a copy of your message.
> 
> I figured it wasn’t really common to have NMUs like this, but given the fact that the package is not orphaned but its maintainers have not replied to bug reports, I thought this was one of the few options; I don’t really care how the newer versions are uploaded, so long as they get uploaded eventually!
> 
> As far as I can tell from `apt-cache depends`, nothing outside of the polyml source package depends on any of the binary packages in it.
> 
> 1) makes sense to go via experimental
> 2,3,4) I shall see what I can do
> 
> In case you couldn’t tell I’m very new to this, so thanks for taking the time to go through the details.
> 
> Thanks,
> James
> 
>> On 25 Sep 2015, at 17:32, Gianfranco Costamagna <costamagnagianfranco@yahoo.it> wrote:
>> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA256
>> 
>> Hi, this is really too much for an NMU.
>> 
>> Did you test reverse dependencies?
>> 
>> you are bumping shlibs, so you need to be sure to have requested a
>> transition slot on release.debian.org (use reportbug against it to ask
>> one).
>> 
>> I would do rather a team upload instead, and I would appreciate:
>> 
>> 1) an upload to experimental to test rebuilds
>> 2) converting to dh format
>> 3) use of autoreconf instead of autotools-dev
>> 4) convert to multiarch?
>> 
>> I can check the other things later if you still are interested.
>> 
>> cheers,
>> 
>> G.
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v2
>> 
>> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWBXcZAAoJEPNPCXROn13Z3roP/2GHZv1CWdA2K4/74IfvY3/+
>> vfCcXVKLp31bgaa41tTvV2oV2dSbAiTlqSUwnZFJygFaqp6eXuweVVPdf0cT5IfV
>> ZTG3w3n0JcK/u/cgu0nvHm6Cy/ENb9LD/YIRJ7ZTI8u5AiiVpGGAc+WY0j9150Bc
>> NyWYw8HMFxav3tR6vPjh0R2I1QgN7WjHbZLmgIqlaJbZgjqMu1O4lYzhfn/wL3ub
>> LcJYCHk0BI5pB48ABfx7fLs0DrvOaEoQ63l5mM1uX6BgpAiXdAQSY5qE5enUSH6a
>> Aq60l7E3DxeKERUnTuGMRj3529abSDRxteAMMTP2IlXoKYV2h5XHCJlLmbjunKV1
>> KDAqwoZGQpia81jM6hKdZbbbOZfpzzevW14yj2x0qYQEVyMv+7lSDP6p1o7VHYyL
>> zSNKGzquIGcCeTkDQ1pTeuYm3HPsuIjmXD1saG2qInE6F9ccie0n8AT8WEInGGMd
>> UHcBu/cHhyyBiThUcZhgQEuU+Pf1kRy0f9SbPTibFtlvKf3HOgB2DD018WK7JFBB
>> rF46I2Jr4V5TbHh3nmPhJhk46MFjDyxfOW9rE60jpeJcopMoK6xBUTBlM1mwQrud
>> JGrjUztjgDd8BX+/LDzr4IZXPc67LcQghrYAUOgzNhe/jAI9gnsp0JTi7rwaEN82
>> hm7eOneGezYiwC18gEFH
>> =tPZ/
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


Reply to: