On Mon, 2015-09-28 at 13:13 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote: > That's also what I understand since you wrote that upfront. Sorry if I > sounded rude :-/ I was merely arguing in case a potential sponsor would > wait for me to fix these before stepping forward ;-) I see, thanks for the clarification. I agree these are minor issues. > Yeah, many thanks for the review anyway. And as far as I'm concerned > the advertisement is a success and I'll make sure to watch your talk from > Debconf ;-) This year was only a check-all-the-things BoF and it wasn't recorded but I presented the tool at DebConf14 in the live demos session: http://meetings-archive.debian.net/pub/debian-meetings/2014/debconf14/webm/Live_Demos.webm https://gobby.debian.org/export/debconf15/bof/check-all-things > Yes indeed, I also found this tarball, but it's much older than github's > 2.4.0. In particular IPv6 addresses are not supported. Interesting, so I guess the version numbers are a bit murky :( > Yeah the way #718434 is a pity IMHO :-/ Anyway that's why I intend to > to switch to Let's Encrypt in two months. LE can't come soon enough :) -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part