Bug#800319: marked as done (RFS: arrayfire/3.1.2+dfsg1-1)
Your message dated Mon, 28 Sep 2015 11:07:04 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <1165771024.2670139.1443438424974.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#800319: RFS: arrayfire/3.1.2+dfsg1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #800319,
regarding RFS: arrayfire/3.1.2+dfsg1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
800319: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=800319
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "arrayfire"
* Package name : arrayfire
Version : 3.1.2+dfsg1-1
Upstream Author : ArrayFire Development Group
* URL : http://arrayfire.com/
* License : BSD
Section : science
It builds those binary packages:
libarrayfire-cpu-dev - Development files for ArrayFire (CPU backend)
libarrayfire-cpu3 - High performance library for parallel computing
(CPU backend)
libarrayfire-cpu3-dbg - Debugging symbols for ArrayFire (CPU backend)
libarrayfire-doc - Common documentation for ArrayFire
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/arrayfire
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/arrayfire/arrayfire_3.1.2+dfsg1-1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
* New upstream release.
* d/patches:
- refresh patch bugfix-in-assign.patch,
- drop patch bugfix-cpuid-usage.patch, applied upstream.
* d/rules: drop restriction of test suite to 64-bit architectures only.
Best regards,
Ghislain Vaillant
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Ghislain,
I sponsored the package, however :
1) ./src/backend/cpu/platform.cpp: mVendorId = "Unkown, probably ARM";
(typo)
2) I was also a little bit worried about the rules file, but your indep/arch
targets seems to work, for this reason I did a source-only upload, lets see
it buildd works too :)
3) I couldn't test arm64, please consider checking if the arch builds fine next time
4) please run again wrap-and-sort, because the control file looks ugly in this upload
(at least to me, but you are free to put this nitpick in dev/null :D )
5) please try to be more verbose in changelog
"- refactor rules file by splitting targets" or whatever might be worth a mention.
But the package was fine, so Built&Signed&Uploaded, thanks for your contribution to Debian!
cheers,
G.
--- End Message ---
Reply to: