Bug#799768: RFS: ismrmrd/1.3.1-1

[Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com>]

I have uploaded a new version, which should have addressed all your 
previous comments.

Many thanks for your valuable feedback and pieces of advice.

Ghis


On 22/09/15 19:40, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> I can sponsor the package with that lintian warning.
> as said before the package should be lintian clean as long as lintian is
> correct.
> But overriding lintian is wrong, because it is still an issue.
>
> If it is ok for you I would prefer a package with a lintian warning.
>
> cheers,
>
> Gianfranco
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
> <https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.src=Android>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From*:"Ghislain Vaillant" <ghisvail@gmail.com>
> *Date*:Tue, 22 Sep, 2015 at 19:33
> *Subject*:Bug#799768: RFS: ismrmrd/1.3.1-1
>
>
> On 22/09/15 17:32, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>  > I would appreciate a lintian warning instead of a broken documentation
>  >
>  >
>  > e.g. look at
>  > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736360
>  >
>  >
>  > G.
>
>  >
>
> Should the warning be overridden for the purpose or the review? Apart
> from that, I am ready to push a final version.
>
> I have to say that the lucene++ package you quoted really inspired from
> a packaging standpoint. Now the ismrmrd packaging feels really clean.
>
> Ghis