[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#796395: RFS: rolldice/1.14-1 ITA



Whoops, forgot to fill in some details:

  Upstream Author : Stevie Strickland <sstrickl@cs.brown.edu>
* URL             : https://github.com/sstrickl/rolldice
* License         : GPL-2

On 21/08/15 01:47 PM, Thomas Ross wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
> 
> Dear mentors,
> 
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rolldice"
> 
> * Package name    : rolldice
>   Version         : 1.14-1
>   Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
> * URL             : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
> * License         : [fill in]
>   Section         : games
> 
> It builds those binary packages:
> 
> 	rolldice   - virtual dice roller
> 
> To access further information about this package, please visit the
> following URL:
> 
>   http://mentors.debian.net/package/rolldice
> 
> 
> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
> 
>     dget -x
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rolldice/rolldice_1.14-1.dsc
> 
> More information about rolldice can be obtained from
> https://github.com/sstrickl/rolldice
> 
> Changes since the last upload:
> 
> rolldice (1.14-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> 
>   * New upstream release (Closes: #74583, #672418)
>   * Removed patch 01_remove_strip.diff - fixed upstream
>   * Removed patch debian-changes-1.10-5
>   * Don't timestamp the man page
>   * debian/control
>      - Bump standards-version to 3.9.6
>      - Removed quilt from build-depends
>      - Added libreadline-dev to build-depends
>      - Updated homepage
>      - New maintainer (Closes: #784189))
>      - Removed article from short description
>   * debian/rules
>      - Remove 'dh_clean -k' in favor of 'dh_prep'
>      - Hardened executables
>      - Add build-arch and build-indep targets
> 
>  -- Thomas Ross <th0m4sr0ss@gmail.com>  Thu, 20 Aug 2015 20:55:20 -0400
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Thomas Ross
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: