[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#793171: RFS: git-lfs/0.5.2-1 [ITP]



Responses inline.  New package available at
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/git-lfs/git-lfs_0.5.4-1.dsc.

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 4:24 AM, Hugo Lefeuvre <hugo6390@fr33tux.org> wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Here are some remaining problems I'd like to see solved before sponsoring
> the package.
>
> (1) debian/control:
> -------------------
>
>   - Concerning git "(>= 1.8.0)": The version in jessie-backports is
>     2.1, so anyway this condition will be verified in case of a
>     backport to stable. This condition would also be verified in case
>     of a backport to oldstable since the version in wheezy-backports is
>     1.9.1.
>   - Concerning golang-go "(>= 1.3.0)": The version in jessie is
>     1.3.3, so anyway this condition will be verified in case of a
>     backport to stable. This condition would also be verified in case
>     of a backport to oldstable since the version in wheezy-backports is
>     1.3.3.
>
> FYI, the Release Team doesn't always accepts backports to stable.
> However, if the backport of your package is accepted, it will go
> to the jessie-backports archive[0].

I completely understand that.  My point was that I think it is
beneficial to keep the version requirements there in case someone
wants to backport it.  That way they will not run into unexpected
problems.  If you don't think that is beneficial I can remove it.

>
> (2) debian/changelog:
> ---------------------
>
>   - Why have you increased the debian revision number ? This package is
>     the first debian release, so the complete package version number should
>     be 0.5.4-1.
>   - Why have you made three changelog entries ? This package haven't
>     been uploaded to the Debian archive so, only one entry is allowed.
>   - Usually, the changelog entry for an initial release looks like:
>
>       * Initial release. (Closes: ITPBUG)
>

I increased it as I was updating the package and publishing to
mentors.  In retrospect that was not necessary or correct.  I have
pushed 0.5.4-1 which incorporates all these changes.

> (3) debian/copyright:
> ---------------------
>
>   - Please, specify an e-mail adress after your name in the Copyright
>     field of d/copyright, like so:
>
>       Files: debian/*
>       Copyright: 2015 Stephen Gelman <ssgelm@gmail.com>
>       License: Expat
>

Email added.

> Thanks !
>
> Regards,
>  Hugo
>
> [0] http://backports.debian.org/Contribute/
>
> --
>       Hugo Lefeuvre (hugo6390)    |    www.hugo6390.org
> 4096/ ACB7 B67F 197F 9B32 1533 431C AC90 AC3E C524 065E


Reply to: