> One option would be to just patch the build system and comment out the part where the offending build flag is set. I
> doubt however that upstream would be happy with this solution, since they must have setup their CI infrastructure
> around this option I presume.
> I am wondering what would be a good solution to suggest upstream about. I guess it is just more convenient for them to
> let the build system handle mutliarch builds, including setting the appropriate build flags and arch-dependent install paths
> instead of setting a proper build environment up like dh does.
I do not know what is the recommended way in cmake for this kind of "multi-arch" things.
maybe someone with more cmake experience can tell how to deal with this kind of problem.
Cheers
FredFrom what I read, other packages just patch the build system to avoid setting the m32 / m64 flags explicitly.I'll update both clBLAS and clFFT with this change and report back.Ghis