Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel-games@lists.debian.org
Thanks
Dear mentors and pkg-gamers,
I am looking for a sponsor for my updated packages "redeclipse" and "redeclipse-data":
* Package name : redeclipse
Version : 1.5.1-1
Upstream Author : Quinton "Quin" Reeves <qreeves@gmail.com>
: Lee "Eihrul" Salzman <lsalzman@gmail.com>
: Red Eclipse Team and others
* URL : http://redeclipse.net
* License : Zlib, CC-BY-SA-3.0+
Section : games
It builds those binary packages:
redeclipse - free, casual arena shooter
redeclipse-common - common config files for the Red Eclipse FPS game
redeclipse-dbg - debug symbols for the Red Eclipse FPS game
redeclipse-server - server for the Red Eclipse FPS game
redeclipse-server-dbg - debug symbols for the Red Eclipse dedicated server
Changelog:
redeclipse (1.5.1-1) experimental; urgency=low
* New upstream release 1.5 "Aurora Edition" Patch 1
- See release announcement at
https://github.com/red-eclipse/base/releases/tag/v1.5.0 for upstream
changelog
- Keep "Red Eclipse" untranslated as a proper name (Closes: #734407)
* Update description to read "cross-platform multiplayer" instead of listing
supported OS (Closes: #763651)
* Drop upstreamed patches
- Delete don-t-check-for-keymap-when-using-standalone.patch
- Delete gnu-link-rt.patch
* Bump standards-version to 3.9.6, no changes
* Add redeclipse-common package for client/server shared files
- Add system-install-Add-common-install-target-for-common-.patch
* Add AppData file via upstream patches
- Add appdate-Use-template-set-at-install-name.patch
- Add appdata-Upgrade-via-appstream-util.patch
- Add appdata-Fill-in-remove-FIXMEs.patch
- Add appdata-Update-description-screenshots.patch
- Add system-install-Install-appdata.patch
* Make sure guidelines.txt is accessible by client for first-connect
- Add system-install-Add-doc-link-for-client-finding-guide.patch
* Use make variables instead of patch to build with system Enet
- Drop build-with-system-enet.patch
* Package name : redeclipse-data
Version : 1.5.1-1
Upstream Author : Red Eclipse Team and others
* URL : http://redeclipse.net
* License : CC_BY-SA-3.0+, Zlib and various
Section : games
It builds this binary package:
redeclipse-data - data for the Red Eclipse FPS game
Changelog:
redeclipse-data (1.5.1-1) experimental; urgency=low
* New upstream release 1.5.1
* Bump standards-version to 3.9.6, no changes
The packages are up on mentors:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/redeclipse
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/redeclipse/redeclipse_1.5.1-1.dsc
(Note that the data package is ~745MB)
http://mentors.debian.net/package/redeclipse-data
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/redeclipse-data/redeclipse-data_1.5.1-1.dsc
The packaging is done in git:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-games/redeclipse.git;a=summary
git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-games/redeclipse.git
(Note that the data clone is ~980M)
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-games/redeclipse-data.git;a=summary
git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-games/redeclipse-data.git
Lintian for redeclipse:
N: The license is CC-BY-SA-3.0+, meaning "or later", albeit valid, is not a
N: recognised license shortname.
N: The stand-alone license paragraph has the standard CC-BY-SA-3.0 version.
O: redeclipse source: missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright cc-by-sa-3.0+ (paragraph at line 73)
N: A summary license field in the header should be allowed according to the
N: specification, probable false positive, see #769818.
O: redeclipse source: missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright red-eclipse (paragraph at line 57)
# Not provided by upstream
P: redeclipse source: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature
# No it isn't
I: redeclipse-common: extended-description-is-probably-too-short
Lintian for redeclipse-data:
N: The license is CC-BY-SA-3.0+, meaning "or later", albeit valid, is not a
N: recognised license shortname.
N: The stand-alone license paragraph has the standard CC-BY-SA-3.0 version.
O: redeclipse source: missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright cc-by-sa-3.0+ (paragraph at line 73)
N: A summary license field in the header should be allowed according to the
N: specification, probable false positive, see #769818.
O: redeclipse source: missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright red-eclipse (paragraph at line 57)
# Not provided by upstream
P: redeclipse source: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature
# No it isn't
I: redeclipse-common: extended-description-is-probably-too-short
I would be very happy if someone could review and/or upload this package for me.
Thanks!
--
Martin Erik Werner <martinerikwerner@gmail.com>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part