[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#779667: RFS: node-bluebird/2.9.13+dfsg-1 [ITP]





On 2015-03-04 02:11, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 03/04/2015 07:53 AM, Ross Gammon wrote:
On 03/03/2015 09:33 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
* Remove async.js and use packaged version instead
This looks a lintian false positive, the async.js in bluebird is
quite different from the node-async one.

Compare:

http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-async.git/tree/lib/async.js



http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-bluebird.git/tree/src/async.js
I think reverting this change and adding a lintian override
instead is a better idea.
Whoops - I should of checked that. I was in a hurry to finish -
that is never a good thing. I have a few family commitments
tonight, but after that I will fix.
There is no hurry getting the the openlayers dependency tree packaged,
there is a lot of work to do which will take quite some time and
that's not a problem. Remember: Good things come to those who wait. :-)

Kind Regards,

Bas

- -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=adMa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Reply to: