[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#772840: marked as done (RFS: pyzolib/0.3.3-1 [ITP] -- Utilities for the Pyzo environment)



Your message dated Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:26:21 +0000
with message-id <E1Y0YTV-0007Qk-1B@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFS: pyzolib/0.3.3-1 [ITP] -- Utilities for the Pyzo environment
has caused the Debian Bug report #772840,
regarding RFS: pyzolib/0.3.3-1 [ITP] -- Utilities for the Pyzo environment
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
772840: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=772840
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyzolib":

* Package name    : pyzolib
  Version         : 0.3.3
  Upstream Author : Almar Klein <almar.klein@gmail.com>
* URL             : https://bitbucket.org/pyzo/pyzolib
* License         : BSD
  Section         : Science

It builds those binary packages:

 python-pyzolib - Utilities for the Pyzo environment (Python 2)
 python3-pyzolib - Utilities for the Pyzo environment (Python 3)

To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

 http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/pyzolib.git

I am intending to ask for a sponsor via the sponsorship of blends.


Changes since the last upload:

  Initial release (Closes: #772825)


Regards,
- Ghislain

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package pyzolib version 0.3.3-1 is in unstable now.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/pyzolib

--- End Message ---

Reply to: