On 12/05/2014 09:43 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Ross Gammon <ross@the-gammons.net> wrote: >> As I said before I will be happy to co-maintain this with you in the >> Debian Multimedia team. I am now a DM. So if we can convince a sponsor >> to upload sfarklib, then after it passes the new queue we may be able to >> convince the same sponsor to give me upload permission sometime. > > > I'm willing to sponsor as long as the packages have 2 comaintainers. > I;ve been busy and may continue so for the next few weeks, so maybe it > will take some time for me to actually look at the packages though. > > Thanks for the offer Felipe :-) Ruben, sfarkxtc looks fine to me and I only have two minor comments 1. Same as for sfarlib, providing a get-orig-source target would be nice, as it sounds like upstream will not be doing releases. 2. $cme check dpkg-control complains that the binary short description is too long. We could drop the "in the legacy" bit in "Converts soundfonts in the legacy sfArk v2 file format to sf2" and just say "from"? Cheers, Ross
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature