[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#771774: RFS: libmongo-client/0.1.8-2 [ITA]



Hello Gergely,


first thnks for your review.

Am Mittwoch, den 03.12.2014, 21:57 +0100 schrieb Gergely Nagy:
> >>>>> "Jörg" == Jörg Frings-Fürst <debian@jff-webhosting.net> writes:
[...]
> 
> As the former maintainer and upstream, there are a few issues I see with
> the packaging (also sent earlier in private mail, but repeating here in
> case someone was looking at the package and wanting to sponsor it).
> 
> * Instead of disabling the watch file, if you tweak the regexp to only
>   match upstream releases, then it will work, and not catch my old
>   debian/ tags:
> 
>   ,----
>   | version=3
>   |
>   | https://github.com/algernon/libmongo-client/releases .*/libmongo-client-([\d\.]+)\.tar\.gz
>   `----

Thanks. And changed to your version.

> 
> * The build: target was there for a reason. Without it, we will build
>   the arch-indep stuff by default too, which is something we want to
>   avoid.
> 
>   For example, it will FTBFS on buildds, because they do not install
>   build-depends-indep. And we really don't want doxygen and graphviz in
>   B-D, because those pull in a shitload of stuff, to build docs that
>   will be discarded by buildds anyway.

I fully agree with you.
But where are the problem? The package has no FTBFS and I don't change
your -arch / -indep division. 

Please can you specify your minds.


> 
> * Why move --dbg-package from DH_OPTIONS to an override?
> 

--dbg-package is only needed in dh_strip[1]. 


CU
Jörg


[1] https://wiki.debian.org/DebugPackage
 
-- 
New:
GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB  30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D
GPG Key: 8CA1D25D
CAcert Key S/N: 0E:D4:56

Old (will be revoked after 2014-12-31):
pgp Fingerprint: 7D13 3C60 0A10 DBE1 51F8  EBCB 422B 44B0 BE58 1B6E
pgp Key: BE581B6E

Jörg Frings-Fürst
D-54526 Niederkail

Threema: SYR8SJXB

IRC: j_f-f@freenode.net
     j_f-f@oftc.net


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: