Bug#766564: marked as done (RFS: prt/0.19-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:24:54 +0000
with message-id <E1Xhhfa-0001WU-Mi@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFS: prt/0.19-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #766564,
regarding RFS: prt/0.19-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
766564: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=766564
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
User: debian-devel@debian.or.jp
Usertags: debianjp
Control: block 743021 by -1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "prt"
* Package name : prt
Version : 0.19-1
Upstream Author : hitode909 <hitode909@gmail.com>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~hitode/App-PRT-0.19/
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
Section : perl
It builds those binary packages:
prt - Command line Perl Refactoring Tool
To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/prt
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/prt/prt_0.19-1.dsc
More information about prt can be obtained from https://metacpan.org/pod/prt
regards,
--
KURASHIKI Satoru
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-30-pve (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package prt has been removed from mentors.
--- End Message ---
Reply to: