[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#766117: marked as done (RFS: lxtask/0.1.6-1)



Your message dated Fri, 24 Oct 2014 00:27:35 -0700
with message-id <CACZd_tBYiUUBqL6S+AfAcP=AnZbeMJiQ59ck0QA=J2Eu_zk=tQ@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Closing RFS bugs for uploaded packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #766117,
regarding RFS: lxtask/0.1.6-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
766117: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=766117
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lxtask"

 * Package name    : lxtask
   Version         : 0.1.6-1
   Upstream Author : LXDE team
 * URL             : http://lxde.org
 * License         : GPL-2
   Section         : x11

It builds those binary packages:

 lxtask     - LXDE task manager
 lxtask-dbg - LXDE task manager (debug)

To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/lxtask

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lxtask/lxtask_0.1.6-1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

  * Merging upstream version 0.1.6.
  * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6.
  * Adding lintian-overrides file for debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature.

  Regards,
  Andriy Grytsenko.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
libfm/1.2.3-1, pcmanfm/1.2.3-1, lxinput/0.3.4-1, lxlauncher/0.2.4-1,
lxtask/0.1.6-1 uploaded to sid.

Vincent

--- End Message ---

Reply to: