[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#765989: RFS: gnome-system-tools/3.0.0-4 [ITA]



Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-system-tools"

 * Package name    : gnome-system-tools
   Version         : 3.0.0-4
   Upstream Author : 2002-2003 Jean-Baptiste LAMY
 * URL             : http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gnome-system-tools/
 * License         : GPL-2
   Section         : gnome

It builds those binary packages:

  gnome-system-tools - Cross-platform configuration utilities for GNOME

To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/gnome-system-tools

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnome-system-tools/gnome-system-tools_3.0.0-4.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

 * New maintainer (Closes: #764266)

 [ Vlad Orlov ]
 * dont-ignore-oobsresult.patch: new patch. Don't ignore OobsResult in a
   callback function, show the message dialog instead (Closes: #761824).

 [ Thaddäus Tintenfisch ]
 * Add 12_fix_exit.patch: Drop unneeded g_object_unref call to fix a
   segmentation fault on exit after a new user has been created.
   Adjust gst_users_tool_finalize to fix some warnings/error messages
   (Closes: #729477).

 [ Andriy Grytsenko ]
 * debian/control:
   - Lower the relations with gnome-control-center to Suggests (Closes: #753701).
   - Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6 (Fixes lintian warning).
   - Remove invalid statements from gnome-system-tools.pc.in (Fixes lintian
     error pkg-config-bad-directive).
   - Remove Vcs-* fields due to package adoption, new ones will be added later.
   - Remove system-tools-backends from Depends: liboobs depends on it instead.
   - Add alternative for policykit-1-gnome: mate-polkit.
 * debian/copyright:
   - Change to a machine-readable format (for lintian).

  Regards,
  Andriy Grytsenko.


Reply to: