Bug#760761: marked as done (RFS: tinyows/1.1.0-5)
Your message dated Mon, 08 Sep 2014 16:24:54 +0000
with message-id <E1XR1kM-0004Yp-9I@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFS: tinyows/1.1.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #760761,
regarding RFS: tinyows/1.1.0-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
760761: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760761
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tinyows"
Package name : tinyows
Version : 1.1.0-5
Upstream Author : Barbara Philippot, Olivier Courtin and the MapServer team.
URL : http://www.mapserver.org/tinyows/
License : MIT
Section : non-free/web
It builds those binary packages:
tinyows - lightweight and fast WFS-T server
To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/tinyows
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/t/tinyows/tinyows_1.1.0-5.dsc
More information about TinyOWS can be obtained from http://www.mapserver.org/tinyows/.
Changes since the last upload:
* Update postgis dependency for PostgreSQL 9.4, depend on postgis instead of
postgis and postgis version specific package.
* Don't install demo and test files.
* Include README.Debian.
* Include example tinyows.xml configuration file.
Regards,
Bas Couwenberg
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package tinyows version 1.1.0-5 is in unstable now.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/tinyows
--- End Message ---
Reply to: