Bug#757881: marked as done (RFS: eggdrop/1.6.21-4)
Your message dated Wed, 20 Aug 2014 20:00:34 +0200
with message-id <1408557634.21710.3.camel@edoras.loewenhoehle.ip>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #757881,
regarding RFS: eggdrop/1.6.21-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
757881: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757881
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eggdrop"
* Package name : eggdrop
Version : 1.6.21-4
Upstream Author : EggHeads Development Team <eggheads@eggheads.org>
* URL : http://www.eggheads.org/
* License : GPL-2+
Section : net
It builds those binary packages:
eggdrop - Advanced IRC Robot
eggdrop-data - Architecture independent files for eggdrop
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/eggdrop
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/eggdrop/eggdrop_1.6.21-4.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
* clang-ftbfs.diff:
- Fix FTBFS with clang-3.5 (Closes: #757400)
- Apply patch from Arthur Marble, thank you!
Regards,
Cédric Barboiron
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Builded & Uploading....
BTW, can you please check and fix or override the following linitan
messages:
I: eggdrop: hardening-no-fortify-functions
usr/lib/eggdrop/modules/compress.so
I: eggdrop: hardening-no-fortify-functions
usr/lib/eggdrop/modules/ctcp.so
Thanks for your contribution.
--
tobi
--- End Message ---
Reply to: