[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#749552: marked as done (RFS: gnustep-back/0.24.0-1)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Jul 2014 16:24:23 +0000
with message-id <E1X3pEl-0003en-SQ@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFS: gnustep-back/0.24.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #749552,
regarding RFS: gnustep-back/0.24.0-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
749552: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=749552
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Control: block -1 with 749452

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnustep-back".
It builds these binary packages:

gnustep-back-common - GNUstep GUI Backend - common files
gnustep-back-dbg - GNUstep GUI Backend - debugging symbols
gnustep-back0.24 - GNUstep GUI Backend
gnustep-back0.24-art - GNUstep GUI Backend (art)
gnustep-back0.24-cairo - GNUstep GUI Backend (cairo)

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/gnustep-back

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnustep-back/gnustep-back_0.24.0-1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

gnustep-back (0.24.0-1) experimental; urgency=low

  * New major upstream release.
  * Ack NMU, thanks gregor herrmann.
  * debian/rules (build-arch, build-indep): Remove dependency on
    $(QUILT_STAMPFN).
    (v_gui): Bump to 0.24.
    (p_gpbs, d_gpbs): Remove.
    (install-art): Move gpbs to -common.
    (binary-arch): Install the manpage in -common.  Bump alternatives
    priority of cairo to make it the default.
    (install-indep): Do not create Developer symlink.
  * debian/patches/cairo-fc.patch: Delete, not needed anymore.
  * debian/patches/fontconfig-libs.patch: New, fixes FTBFS with
    -Wl,--no-undefined.
  * debian/patches/autoreconf.patch: Regenerate.
  * debian/patches/series: Update.
  * debian/control.m4 (gnustep-gpbs): Remove, it seems unnecessary kludge
    to have it as an extra package.
    (gnustep-back`'SOV_BACK) <Depends>: Replace art with cairo.
    (gnustep-back-common) <Architecture>: Set to "any".
    <Depends>: Add ${shlibs:Depends}.  Remove version requirement for
    mknfonts.tool.
    <Breaks, Replaces>: Add gnustep-gpbs.
    (gnustep-back-dbg) <Depends>: Replace gnustep-gpbs with
    gnustep-back-common.
    <Recommends>: Replace libgnustep-gui0.22-dbg with
    libgnustep-gui0.24-dbg.
    (Suggests): Replace ttf-dejavu with fonts-dejavu.
    (Vcs-Git): Use the canonical URI.
    (Standards-Version): Bump to 3.9.5 (no changes needed).
  * debian/control: Regenerate.
  * debian/gnustep-back-common.postinst: In case of failure, inform about
    /var/log/gnustep-back-common.log.
  * debian/gnustep-back-common.prerm: Delete gnustep-back-common.log only
    on purge.
  * debian/copyright: Update copyright years, add more copyright holders
    and licenses.  Clarify that gpbs's license is GPLv3+.

The RC bug (#663388) is actually fixed, waiting for the GNUstep
transition to take effect.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Package gnustep-back version 0.24.0-1 is in NEW now,
and the package at mentors is not newer (2014-05-28) than the package in NEW (2014-05-28),
so there is currently no package to sponsor.

http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/gnustep-back_0.24.0-1.html
http://mentors.debian.net/package/gnustep-back

Please remove the package from mentors or mark it "needs sponsor = no".
If for some reason you need to replace the package in NEW,
then you can upload an updated package to mentors
and feel free to reopen this RFS 749552 or open a new RFS.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: