[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#744253: marked as done (RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.39-1 [RC])

Your message dated Thu, 8 May 2014 02:06:57 +0200
with message-id <20140508000657.GB21918@x230-buxy.home.ouaza.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#744253: RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.39-1 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #744253,
regarding RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.39-1 [RC]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
744253: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=744253
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ledgersmb"

* Package name     : ledgersmb
  Version          : 1.3.39-1
  Upstream Contact : Chris Travers <chris@metatrontech.com>
* URL              : http://www.ledgersmb.org/
* License          : GPL-2+
  Section          : web

It builds those binary packages:

    ledgersmb  - financial accounting and ERP program

To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/ledgersmb

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

    dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/ledgersmb/ledgersmb_1.3.39-1.dsc

More information about LedgerSMB can be obtained from http://www.ledgersmb.org.

Changes since the last upload:

  * New upstream release. (Closes: #732997)
  * Changes to debian/copyright:
    - Update the LedgerSMB Core Team related information.
    - Add a file stanza for the locale/po/es_AR.po file.
    - Add an entry for utils/notify_short/.*pl and it README file.
    - Add an entry for the tools/prepare-company-database.* scripts.
  * Changes to debian/control:
    - Update Standards-Version in debian/control.
    - Add the libplack-perl package as a Suggests.
    - Update the Vcs-Svn base URL from 'svn.debian.org' to 'anomscm.debian.org'.
  * Changes to debian/rules:
    - Add line to make tools/system/lsmb* scripts executables.
    - Remove the line used to copy the ledgersmb.conf.template file as it is
      no longer needed.
  * Changes to debian/patches/:
    - Add usage of 'Last-Update' field in all *.patch files.
    - Update default 'contrib-dir' to be for Postgresql 9.3 in 05_confdir.patch.
    - Add 20_BashPath.patch to resolve bash path issues in tools/ scripts.
    - Add 21_lsmb_13-fcgi-conf.patch for setting its directory paths.
  * Update packaging for installation of ledgersmb-httpd configuration for
    Apache v2.2 and v2.4. (Closes: #725758) 
  * Changes to debian/ledgersmb.docs:
   - Add README.git to the installed documents list.
   - Add README.plack to the installed documents list.
  * Register the release notes using debian/ledgersmb.doc-base.notes.
  * Add empty directory 'UI/logout/' to ledgersmb.lintian-overrides file.
  * Update README.Debian, TODO.Debian, and NEWS.Debian files for new release.



Regards,
  Robert James Clay
  jame@rocasa.us


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Wed, 07 May 2014, RJ Clay wrote:
> >Otherwise I'll try to have a look at it later. Possibly by the end of the
> >week.
> >
>     I'm into my 'weekend'  now, and I can certainly understand if you
> haven't had a chance (yet?) to take a look at it.   If you're not able, I'd
> still like to thank you for all the previous times you've helped me with the
> package.

I'm sorry for the delay, I had a quick look and uploaded the package. I
would appreciate if you could find another sponsor for the future.

Ideally I should grant you DM rights so that you can handle this package
alone, you have been rather careful while handling this packages (even if
not very quick) and it might be OK.

How do you feel about handling the package alone without any review? 

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Discover the Debian Administrator's Handbook:
→ http://debian-handbook.info/get/

--- End Message ---
Reply to: