Bug#744280: RFS: cpl-plugin-xshoo/2.4.0+dfsg-1 (name change)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Thibaut,
Am 13.04.2014 14:45, schrieb Thibaut Paumard:
I mainly followed the rule of renaming a package.
"Replaces" is correct wrt policy:
7.6 Overwriting files and replacing packages - Replaces
Packages can declare in their control file that they should overwrite
files in certain other packages, or completely replace other packages.
The Replaces control field has these two distinct purposes.
No.
Yes.
On default, yes. However, they can (with python-cpl) both separately
accessed by using the version number as argument
No.
That one should stay, see above.
Removing the "Conflicts" field would create the special case that the
old version and the new version of the pipeline are co-installable,
what is not the case for the other recipes. This is however not a real
problem.
It does. The recipes are still named as before.
Seems a bit complicated for a popconn-zero package.
So, maybe the best would be just to remove the Conflicts field. Would
you agree?
Best
Ole
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=m2GS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: