Em Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:29:32AM +0100, intrigeri escreveu: > > Thanks for the review :) > > You're welcome. In the future, how about releasing a RC, issueing > a call for reviews and tests, before going the full way to RFS? Sorry about that. I'm trying the "release further, release often" approach but dunno which timespan would be desirable for RFS. I just released 0.3.3 with fixed suggested in this thread. > > - echo "Fatal: no such key $recipient on your GPG keyring." > > + echo "Fatal: no such key $recipient on your OpenPGP keyring." > > ... but I'm not sure "OpenPGP keyring" makes any sense. Unless the > OpenPGP standard defines this concept, I think "GnuPG keyring" would > be more correct. Well noted, thanks :) > >> > + gpg --batch --refresh-keys "$recipient" > >> > >> I'm not sure this really does what you mean here. At least the GnuPG > >> manpage does not talk about it. Perhaps use --recv-keys for > >> better clarity? Yes, it does what's intended, but I changed to --recv-keys. -- rhatto at riseup.net pubkey 66CA01CE2BF2C9B7E8D64E340546823964E39FCA please bring your fingerprint when meeting me
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature