[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#719801: marked as done (RFS: roundup/1.5.0-1)



Your message dated Fri, 07 Mar 2014 04:27:01 +0000
with message-id <E1WLmNB-0004l5-OQ@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFS: roundup/1.5.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #719801,
regarding RFS: roundup/1.5.0-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
719801: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=719801
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roundup", the python bug tracking software.

* Package name    : roundup
Version         : 1.5.0-1
Upstream Author : Richard Jones
* URL             : roundup-tracker.org
* License         : MIT / ZPL
Section         : web

It builds those binary packages:

roundup    - Simple issue-tracking system

To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/roundup


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/roundup/roundup_1.5.0-1.dsc

More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com.

Major changes since the wheezy (1.4.20-1.1) version:

* New upstream version (which fix 2 bugs)
* Fix a documentation bug
* Move to git-dpm packaging

Please see the changelog for the exact changes.

Kind regards,
Kai Storbeck

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package roundup has been removed from mentors.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: