> A NMU + new upstream release should be versioned with -0.1, e.g. > iceowl-l10n 2.6.4-0.1. Fixed. > Some of the patches are empty; is this intentional? > dpkg-source: warning: diff > `iceowl-l10n-2.6.4/debian/patches/Brand-es-ES.patch' doesn't contain > any patch > dpkg-source: warning: diff > `iceowl-l10n-2.6.4/debian/patches/Brand-it.patch' doesn't contain any > patch No, not intentional. I had to generate a new patchset to match the updated upstream strings, and I must have left those out by mistake. Fixed. I've uploaded an updated package to m.d.n. If you feel further corrections or changes are needed, please let me know. -- Jerome
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature