Bug#738282: RFS: xrdp/0.6.1-2 [ITA]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 1:10 AM, Vincent Cheng <vcheng@debian.org> wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Micheal Waltz <ecliptik@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Package: sponsorship-requests
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xrdp":
>>
>> * Package name : xrdp
>> Version : 0.6.1-2
>> Upstream Author : Jay Sorg
>> * URL : http://www.xrdp.org/
>> * License : GPL-2+, other, PD, MIT
>> Section : net
>>
>> It builds those binary packages:
>>
>> xrdp - Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) server
>>
>> To access further information about this package, please visit the
>> following URL:
>>
>> http://mentors.debian.net/package/xrdp
>>
>> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
>>
>> dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xrdp/xrdp_0.6.1-2.dsc
>>
>> More information about xrdp can be obtained from http://www.xrdp.org
>>
>> Changes since the last upload:
>>
>> 0.6.1-2
>> * Remove patch 01reuse-session.patch (Closes: #710007)
>> * Switch to debhelper 9.
>> * set -e in body of postinst script
>> 0.6.1-1
>> * New Maintainer (Closes: #719624)
>> * New upstream version (Closes: #735678)
>> * Bump standards version
>
> Please merge both of these changelog entries into a single entry.
>
> Also, the source tarball and the .dsc file that you've uploaded to
> mentors.debian.net don't match one another:
>
> $ dpkg-source -x xrdp_0.6.1-2.dsc
> dpkg-source: error: file ./xrdp_0.6.1.orig.tar.gz has size 1570266
> instead of expected 1570168
>
> Your .dsc says that your source tarball has the following sha1sum hash and size:
> 04ccace3f69bf92769d5cc89428d0c4f597cdb1d 1570168 xrdp_0.6.1.orig.tar.gz
>
> However...
> $ sha1sum xrdp_0.6.1.orig.tar.gz
> 14ce17c92c103c2f87e12b7111e3718a70e25680 xrdp_0.6.1.orig.tar.gz
>
> Regards,
> Vincent
Vincent,
Thank you for looking at my RFS for the xrdp package. I was going to
work on the changes mentioned above and re-upload, however last night
the original maintainer of the package contacted me regarding the ITA
request.
He pushed the 0.6.1 update into the official repositories, which I
believe triggered mentors.debian.net to see the official repository
update and automatically remove the xrdp uploads I did to mentors.
I've contacted him directly regarding next steps for continuing the
ITA. Are there additional steps I should take regarding the closure of
this RFS request?
Thank you,
Micheal Waltz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)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=lNyn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: