Bug#726533: RFS: 0install/2.3.3-2 [ITP] -- rename and split zeroinstall-injector package
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Thomas Leonard <talex5@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9 February 2014 09:27, Vincent Cheng <vcheng@debian.org> wrote:
>>
>> And lintian has a fair bit to complain about:
>>
>> W: 0install-core: hardening-no-relro usr/bin/0alias
>> W: 0install-core: hardening-no-relro usr/bin/0desktop
>> W: 0install-core: hardening-no-relro usr/bin/0install
>> W: 0install-core: hardening-no-relro usr/bin/0launch
>> W: 0install-core: hardening-no-relro usr/bin/0store
>> W: 0install-core: hardening-no-relro usr/bin/0store-secure-add
[...]
>
> Thanks! Note that some of these are false positives (it's up to the
> ocaml compiler whether it includes hardening or relies on its own
> static type and bounds checking). I'll get it to check the signature
> though.
FYI:
https://wiki.debian.org/HardeningWalkthrough#My_package_is_.28partly.29_written_in_OCaml
Regards,
Prach
Reply to: