[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#723139: marked as done (RFS: avt/0.2-1 ITP)

Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2014 16:31:25 +0000
with message-id <E1WAiuD-0007SZ-Ml@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFS: avt/0.2-1 ITP
has caused the Debian Bug report #723583,
regarding RFS: avt/0.2-1 ITP
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
723583: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=723583
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: avt
 Severity: normal 

 Dear mentors,

 I am looking for a sponsor for my package "avt"

* Package name    : avt
  Version         : 0.2-1
  Upstream Author : Fernando Iazeolla <xnando@yahoo.it>
* URL             : http://github.com/elboza/avt
* License         : GPL
  Section         : utilities

 It builds those binary packages:

   avt   - Aviation Tools. metar and taf command line.

 To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

 http://mentors.debian.net/package/avt


 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

   dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/avt/avt_0.2-1.dsc

 More information about avt can be obtained from http://github.com/elboza/avt.

 Changes since the last upload:

 avt (0.2-1) unstable; urgency=low

 * Initial release (Closes: #nnnn)  <nnnn is the bug number of your ITP>

-- Fernando Iazeolla <xnando@yahoo.it>  Sun, 15 Sep 2013 22:58:17 +0200



 Regards,
  Fernando Iazeolla

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Package avt has been removed from mentors.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: