[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#726533: marked as done (RFS: 0install/2.3.3-2 [ITP] -- rename and split zeroinstall-injector package)



Your message dated Sun, 19 Jan 2014 01:24:02 -0800
with message-id <CACZd_tBb8P8H_XL+pSSzwBsh2MMQY0XcAVg5XZih+DEZ4xVggg@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: RFS: 0install/2.3.3-2 [ITP] -- rename and split zeroinstall-injector package
has caused the Debian Bug report #726533,
regarding RFS: 0install/2.3.3-2 [ITP] -- rename and split zeroinstall-injector package
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
726533: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=726533
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am a DM, maintaining the zeroinstall-injector package. I have split it into
separate packages to avoid pulling in GTK on headless servers. This saves
around 100 MB when deploying to a fresh server. Could someone check it and
approve the new package names? My previous mentor (Jens Peter Secher) is no
longer a DD.

 * Package name    : 0install
   Version         : 2.3.3-2
   Upstream Author : Thomas Leonard <talex5@gmail.com>
 * URL             : http://0install.net/
 * License         : GNU Lesser General Public License 2.1
   Section         : admin

It now builds these binary packages:

  0install      - cross-distribution packaging system
  0install-core - cross-distribution packaging system (non-GUI parts)
  zeroinstall-injector - transitional package for 0install

I updated the name as "injector" is no longer used, and the main command is now
"0install".

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/0install


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/0/0install/0install_2.3.3-2.dsc

More information about 0install can be obtained from http://0install.net


Regards,
 Thomas Leonard

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 7:21 AM, Thomas Leonard <talex5@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 18 January 2014 06:35, Vincent Cheng <vcheng@debian.org> wrote:
>> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Would you consider changing the name of the source package back to
>> zeroinstall-injector? This won't impact end users (the binary package
>> is 0install now; that's what end users will see, and that's what
>> they'd install), but it makes this transition less of a hassle if you
>> revert to the same source package name.
>
> Done:
>
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/zeroinstall-injector

Built, signed, and uploaded. Thanks for your contribution to Debian!

Regards,
Vincent

--- End Message ---

Reply to: