[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#719713: marked as done (RFS: timelib/0.2.4-1 [ITP] -- short wrapper around PHP's internal DateTime ext)

Your message dated Sat, 04 Jan 2014 04:28:26 +0000
with message-id <E1VzIqY-0001nr-PK@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFS: timelib/0.2.4-1 [ITP] -- short wrapper around PHP's internal DateTime ext
has caused the Debian Bug report #719713,
regarding RFS: timelib/0.2.4-1 [ITP] -- short wrapper around PHP's internal DateTime ext
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
719713: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=719713
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "timelib"

* Package name    : timelib
  Version         : 0.2.4-1
  Upstream Author : PediaPress GmbH
* URL             : https://github.com/pediapress/timelib
* License         : PHP-3.01
  Section         : python

It builds those binary packages:

python-timelib - short wrapper around PHP's internal DateTime ext
python-timelib-dbg - short wrapper around PHP's internal DateTime ext (debug symbols)

To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/timelib


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/timelib/timelib_0.2.4-1.dsc


Regards,
Evgeniy Golyshev

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Package timelib has been removed from mentors.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: