Bug#731036: RFS: think-rotate/3.0-1

[Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>]

On Tue, 03 Dec 2013, Martin Ueding wrote:
> Okay, “thinklight” does not count, then.
> 
> The question is, whether using “thinkpad-” would cause any trouble with
> trademarks?

We'd need to ask a lawyer to get an useful answer to that question, I think.

> I think “thinkpad-utils” or “thinkpad-tools” or “thinkpad-scripts” is an
> improvement. Would those be okay with you?
> 
> The problem is that it started as a single rotation script and then
> evolved into a collection of scripts that do docking, rotating and other
> stuff. The earlier the rename is, the less work it is.

I like "thinkpad-scripts".

I think "thinkpad-tools" would not be a good idea, nor would
"thinkpad-utils", though.  Mostly because the package would not contain the
majority of the stand-alone thinkpad-specific tools and utils (such as tpb,
thinkbat, thinkfan, etc).

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh