Bug#728360: RFS: open-axiom/1.5.0~svn3056-1
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "open-axiom"
* Package name : open-axiom
Version : 1.5.0~svn3056-1
Upstream Author : Gabriel Dos Reis
* URL : http://www.open-axiom.org/
* License : BSD
Section : math
It builds those binary packages:
open-axiom - open scientific computation platform
open-axiom-databases - open scientific computation platform:
generated text databases
open-axiom-graphics - open scientific computation platform: graphics subsystem
open-axiom-graphics-data - open scientific computation platform:
graphics subsystem data
open-axiom-hypertex - open scientific computation platform: hypertex subsystem
open-axiom-hypertex-data - open scientific computation platform:
hypertex subsystem data
open-axiom-source - open scientific computation platform: source files
open-axiom-test - open scientific computation platform: regression test inputs
open-axiom-tex - open scientific computation platform: style file for TeX
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/open-axiom
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/open-axiom/open-axiom_1.5.0~svn3056-1.dsc
More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com.
Changes since the last upload:
* New upstream version.
* Use xz compression for both source tarball and packages
* Require g++ >= 4.7 for C++11
* Refreshed patches
* touch aclocal.m4 -r configure.ac to avoid rebuilding aclocal.m4 which
requires aclocal 1.13
* Do not patch configure.ac, but override variables in Makefiles (due to
automake 1.13 too)
* Require SBCL
* Enable hardening (include /usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk for build flags)
* Use dh-buildinfo
* Override hardening-no-relro on usr/lib/open-axiom/bin/AXIOMsys
* Build depends on autotools-dev to update config.*
* Bump standards version 3.9.3 → 3.9.4, no changes
Regards,
Igor Pashev
Reply to: