[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#725772: marked as done (RFS: nfft/3.2.3-1 [ITP])



Your message dated Mon, 21 Oct 2013 16:26:55 +0000
with message-id <E1VYIJj-0008D0-Ii@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFS: nfft/3.2.3-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #725772,
regarding RFS: nfft/3.2.3-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
725772: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725772
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nfft"

* Package name    : nfft
  Version         : 3.2.3-1
  Upstream Author : Prof. Dr. Daniel Potts
<potts@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de>
* URL             : http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~potts/nfft/
* License         : GPL
  Section         : libs

It builds those binary packages:

libnfft3-1 - Library for computing Non-uniform Fast Fourier
Transforms
libnfft3-dbg - Library for computing Non-uniform Fast Fourier
Transforms
libnfft3-dev - Library for computing Non-uniform Fast Fourier
Transforms

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/nfft


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:

dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nfft/nfft_3.2.3-1.dsc


Changes since the last upload:

  * Initial release (Closes: #725705)


Regards,
  Ghislain Vaillant

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package nfft has been removed from mentors.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: