[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#706904: Chinese Checkers RFS review



On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 08:00:23AM -0400, Dave Steele wrote:
> Do you have a source for that?  I was told otherwise before.

This is what defines a Debian native package.

Here's why it's stupid for non-native packages:

 Upstream: 1.0
 Debian package number: 1.0


Now, when yo update it, you'll have to do something like 1.0+1 for each
upload after. Which sucks. This also means everything will think this
string is the *UPSTREAM* version number, which is really a disaster.

In addition, we use pristine (and hash-identical) tarballs with upstream
releases. You can't do this with 3.0 (native), without being upstream.


I'm all for allowing native packages, but newbies shouldn't be using
them to package software with an upstream.

Cheers,
  Paul

-- 
 .''`.  Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org>
: :'  : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'`  4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352  D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
 `-     http://people.debian.org/~paultag

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: