On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 04:57:41PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Hi,
> Okay, should be fine to go now:
I'm in general fine with the package.
None the less a remark to maybe think about:
a) Is it worth to switch to xz for this package?
b) Is it a good idea to force the compression-level to 9?
For a) I think maybe for b) I guess buildd maintainers and maybe even
devs of weaker arches might hate you. I've no good idea myself how
xz works internally but if I recall the threads on d-d correctly about
making xz the default a compression level above 6 was deemed way too much.
I think even lower levels were proposed as a Debian default when xz will
be the default compression method.
Oh and the orig.tar.gz is still supplied as .tar.gz maybe getting that
switched to xz would make also sense. On the other hand for such a small
package the benefit is small.
Uploaded, thanks Martin.
Cheers,
Sven
--
we live we love we learn and breathe / each breath we take makes me believe
that we can take this road forever / if we take this road together
[ AZ0 - Endless Roads ]
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature