[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#707595: RFS: xnoise/0.2.17-1



"lightweight" is spelled incorrectly in the descriptions.

On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Dominique Lasserre
<lasserre.d@gmail.com> wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the package "xnoise" a lightweight and
> fast GTK+ media player.
>
>  * Package name    : xnoise
>    Version         : 0.2.17-1
>    Upstream Author : Jörn Magens
>  * URL             : https://bitbucket.org/shuerhaaken/xnoise
>  * License         : GPL-2+
>    Section         : sound
>
> It builds those binary packages:
>
>   libxnoise0     - Pretty and leightweight media player for Gtk+ (shared
>                                                               library)
>   xnoise         - Pretty and leightweight media player for Gtk+
>   xnoise-dev     - Pretty and leightweight media player for Gtk+
>                                                          (development)
>   xnoise-plugins - Pretty and leightweight media player for Gtk+
>                                                              (plugins)
>
>
> To access further information about this package, please visit the
> following URL:
>
>   http://mentors.debian.net/package/xnoise
>
>
> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
>
>     dget -x
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xnoise/xnoise_0.2.17-1.dsc
>
>
> The ITP bug can be found here:
>   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=632932
>
>
> The libtaginfo library [1] is required so a sponsor should look at both
> packages (see the blocked by bug).
> Currently there are several patches to make this package lintian clean
> and fix the hardening build. All of those patches are already pushed
> upstream and can be dropped with the next xnoise release.
>
>
> Thank you for your time and help!
>
>
> Regards,
> Dominique Lasserre
>
>
> [1]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707015


Reply to: