I would agree with that. But there is a problem of package building. It
means, we can upload only the binary-version (source-based uploads are
still not implemented in Debian unfortunately), which was built on
armel, what is not always simple or difficult. Also if the package will
require NMU, one need to find such machine to build a package to upload.
@Peter, would you agree to review/upload the package directly to Raspbian?
Anton
On 04/12/2013 02:04 PM, peter green wrote:
> Which brings us to the question of architectures. If this package is
> indeed Pi specific then it makes sense for debian armel and raspbian
> armhf but makes no sense for debian armhf or for any other
> architecture in debian. As such i'd suggest the following changes to
> your debian/control
>
> --- logic-analyzer-rpi-0.1.1/debian/control 2013-04-11
> 05:59:05.000000000 +0100
> +++ logic-analyzer-rpi-0.1.1.new/debian/control 2013-04-12
> 12:50:23.000000000 +0100
> @@ -2,14 +2,15 @@
> Section: electronics
> Priority: optional
> Maintainer: Yves Renier <yrenier@cern.ch>
> -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 8.0.0)
> +#We want this to build on debian armel and raspbian armhf but not
> debian armhf
> +Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 8.0.0), raspbian-archive-keyring [armhf]
> Standards-Version: 3.9.3
> Homepage: https://github.com/superzerg/logi-analyzer
> Vcs-Git: git://github.com/superzerg/logi-analyzer.git
> #Vcs-Browser:
> http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/logic-analyzer-rpi.git;a=summary
>
> Package: logic-analyzer-rpi
> -Architecture: any
> +Architecture: armel armhf
> Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
> Description: Use your Raspberry Pi as a logic analyzer
> logic-analyzer-rpi is a software to capture logic states at with the
> Raspberry
>
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature