[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#695991: marked as done (RFS: awstats/7.1~dfsg-1)

Your message dated Sun, 24 Feb 2013 12:59:14 +0100
with message-id <512A0092.60205@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: RFS: awstats/7.1~dfsg-1 (2nd try)
has caused the Debian Bug report #695991,
regarding RFS: awstats/7.1~dfsg-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
695991: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695991
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

  Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "awstats". I have problems
getting in touch with the Debian Developer (Jonas Smedegaard) that
I've originally worked with.  Could someone else update my DM flag as
per new procedure[1]?

CC'd to James Page due to #687414.  James, could you sponsor this
upload or/and correct my upload permissions?

Closes bugs: 641481 687414 690379

 Package name : awstats
 Version      : 7.0~dfsg-8
 Homepage     : http://awstats.sourceforge.net/
 License      : GPL-2
 Section      : web

  It builds those binary packages:

  awstats - powerful and featureful web server log analyzer

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL's:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/awstats
  http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/awstats/awstats_7.0~dfsg-8.dsc

 [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/09/msg00008.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2013-02-23 12:26, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
>> The reason I am asking is that if we do this upload to unstable and
>> later we find an annoying important bug (i.e. severity important), then
>> we can no longer fix it for Wheezy[1].
> 
> Looks like there is testing-proposed-updates for that, isn't?
> 
> -->8--
> Rule #5. If the version in unstable already includes significant
> changes not related to the bug to be fixed, contact the release team
> about uploading to testing-proposed-updates. Changed dependencies, new
> upstream versions, changed library names and completely rewriting the
> packaging are "significant changes".
> -->8--
> 

Truly, tpu can be used for any RC bug.  However, I was referring to:

"""
  3. fixes for severity: important bugs in packages of priority:
     optional or extra, only when this can be done via unstable;
"""

Btw, there is a caveat here for people maintaining libraries.  A new
version of a library in unstable can prevent other's package from being
able to migrate via unstable.
  Anyway, awstats have no rdeps, so the caveat does not apply here.
Just mentioning for your (and people on d-mentors@l.d.o) information.

>> As I see it, this is your package so the final choice is yours in this
>> mattter.  I just wanted to make sure you were aware of the possible
>> consequences.
> 
> Thus, I'm not sure you are correct.  But anyway, there is no important
> bugs right now for this package.
> 

I know; I wrote "if we later find an important bug".  :)

Anyway, uploaded.

~Niels

--- End Message ---
Reply to: